The central part of our code is our ``LED`` class, which derives from :class:`artiq.language.environment.EnvExperiment`. Among other features, :class:`~artiq.language.environment.EnvExperiment` calls our :meth:`~artiq.language.environment.Experiment.build` method and provides the :meth:`~artiq.language.environment.HasEnvironment.setattr_device` method that interfaces with the device database to create the appropriate device drivers and make those drivers accessible as ``self.core`` and ``self.led``. The :func:`~artiq.language.core.kernel` decorator (``@kernel``) tells the system that the :meth:`~artiq.language.environment.Experiment.run` method must be compiled for and executed on the core device (instead of being interpreted and executed as regular Python code on the host). The decorator uses ``self.core`` internally, which is why we request the core device using :meth:`~artiq.language.environment.HasEnvironment.setattr_device` like any other.
It is important that you supply the correct device database for your system configuration; it is generated by a Python script typically called ``device_db.py`` (see also :ref:`the device database <device-db>`). If you purchased a system from M-Labs, the ``device_db.py`` for your system will normally already have been provided to you (either on the USB stick, inside ``~/artiq`` on the NUC, or by email). If you have the JSON description file for your system on hand, you can use the ARTIQ front-end tool ``artiq_ddb_template`` to generate a matching device database file. Otherwise, you can also find examples in the ``examples`` folder of ARTIQ (sorted in corresponding subfolders per core device) which you can edit to match your system.
Make sure ``device_db.py`` is in the same directory as ``led.py``. The field ``core_addr``, placed at the top of the file, needs to match the current IP address of your core device in order for your host machine to contact it. If you purchased a pre-assembled system and haven't changed the IP address it is normally already set correctly.
Run your code using ``artiq_run``, which is one of the ARTIQ front-end tools: ::
A method or function running on the core device (which we call a "kernel") may communicate with the host by calling non-kernel functions that may accept parameters and may return a value. The "remote procedure call" (RPC) mechanisms automatically handle the communication between the host and the device, conveying between them what function to call, what parameters to call it with, and the resulting value, once returned.
What happens is that the ARTIQ compiler notices that the :meth:`input_led_state` function does not have a ``@kernel`` decorator (:func:`~artiq.language.core.kernel`) and thus must be executed on the host. When the function is called on the core device, it sends a request to the host, which executes it. The core device waits until the host returns, and then continues the kernel; in this case, the host displays the prompt, collects user input, and the core device sets the LED state accordingly.
The return type of all RPC functions must be known in advance. If the return value is not ``None``, the compiler requires a type annotation, like ``-> TBool`` in the example above.
Without the :meth:`~artiq.coredevice.core.Core.break_realtime` call, the RTIO events emitted by :func:`self.led.on()` or :func:`self.led.off()` would be scheduled at a fixed and very short delay after entering :meth:`~artiq.language.environment.Experiment.run()`. These events would fail because the RPC to :meth:`input_led_state()` can take an arbitrarily long amount of time, and therefore the deadline for the submission of RTIO events would have long passed when :func:`self.led.on()` or :func:`self.led.off()` are called (that is, the ``rtio_counter`` wall clock will have advanced far ahead of the timeline cursor ``now``, and an :exc:`~artiq.coredevice.exceptions.RTIOUnderflow` would result; see :ref:`artiq-real-time-i-o-concepts` for the full explanation of wall clock vs. timeline.) The :meth:`~artiq.coredevice.core.Core.break_realtime` call is necessary to waive the real-time requirements of the LED state change. Rather than delaying by any particular time interval, it reads ``rtio_counter`` and moves up the ``now`` cursor far enough to ensure it's once again safely ahead of the wall clock.
The point of running code on the core device is the ability to meet demanding real-time constraints. In particular, the core device can respond to an incoming stimulus or the result of a measurement with a low and predictable latency. We will see how to use inputs later; first, we must familiarize ourselves with how time is managed in kernels.
Create a new file ``rtio.py`` containing the following: ::
In its :meth:`~artiq.language.environment.Experiment.build` method, the experiment obtains the core device and a TTL device called ``ttl0`` as defined in the device database.
In ARTIQ, TTL is used roughly synonymous with "a single generic digital signal" and does not refer to a specific signaling standard or voltage/current levels.
When :meth:`~artiq.language.environment.Experiment.run`, the experiment first ensures that ``ttl0`` is in output mode and actively driving the device it is connected to.
Bidirectional TTL channels (i.e. :class:`~artiq.coredevice.ttl.TTLInOut`) are in input (high impedance) mode by default, output-only TTL channels (:class:`~artiq.coredevice.ttl.TTLOut`) are always in output mode.
This is not what one would expect if the delay and the pulse were implemented with register-based general purpose input output (GPIO) that is CPU-controlled.
The signal's period would depend on CPU speed, and overhead from the loop, memory management, function calls, etc., all of which are hard to predict and variable.
Instead, inside the core device, output timing is generated by the gateware and the CPU only programs switching commands with certain timestamps that the CPU computes.
This guarantees precise timing as long as the CPU can keep generating timestamps that are increasing fast enough. In the case that it fails to do so (and attempts to program an event with a timestamp smaller than the current RTIO clock timestamp), :exc:`~artiq.coredevice.exceptions.RTIOUnderflow` is raised. The kernel causing it may catch it (using a regular ``try... except...`` construct), or allow it to propagate to the host.
Try reducing the period of the generated waveform until the CPU cannot keep up with the generation of switching events and the underflow exception is raised. Then try catching it: ::
It is often necessary for several pulses to overlap one another. This can be expressed through the use of the ``with parallel`` construct, in which the events generated by individual statements are scheduled to execute at the same time, rather than sequentially. The duration of the ``parallel`` block is the duration of its longest statement.
It simply remembers its position on the timeline (``now``) when entering the ``parallel`` block and resets to that position after each individual statement.
At the end of the block, the cursor is advanced to the furthest position it reached during the block.
In other words, the statements in a ``parallel`` block are actually executed sequentially.
Only the RTIO events generated by the statements are *scheduled* in parallel.
Remember that while ``now`` resets at the beginning of each statement in a ``parallel`` block, the wall clock advances regardless. If a particular statement takes a long time to execute (which is different from -- and unrelated to! -- the events *scheduled* by the statement taking a long time), the wall clock may advance past the reset value, putting any subsequent statements inside the block into a situation of negative slack (i.e., resulting in :exc:`~artiq.coredevice.exceptions.RTIOUnderflow` ). Sometimes underflows may be avoided simply by reordering statements within the parallel block. This especially applies to input methods, which generally necessarily block CPU progress until the wall clock has caught up to or overtaken the cursor.
Within a parallel block, some statements can be scheduled sequentially again using a ``with sequential`` block. Observe the pulses generated by this code: ::
``with parallel`` specifically 'parallelizes' the *top-level* statements inside a block. Consider as an example: ::
for i in range(1000000):
with parallel:
self.ttl0.pulse(2*us) # 1
if True: # 2
self.ttl1.pulse(2*us) # 3
self.ttl2.pulse(2*us) # 4
delay(4*us)
This code will not schedule the three pulses to ``ttl0``, ``ttl1``, and ``ttl2`` in parallel. Rather, the pulse to ``ttl1`` is 'parallelized' *with the if statement*. The timeline cursor resets once, at the beginning of statement #2; it will not repeat the reset at the deeper indentation level for #3 or #4.
In practice, the pulses to ``ttl0`` and ``ttl1`` will execute simultaneously, and the pulse to ``ttl2`` will execute after the pulse to ``ttl1``, bringing the total duration of the ``parallel`` block to 4 us. Internally, statements #3 and #4, contained within the top-level if statement, are considered an atomic sequence and executed within an implicit ``with sequential``. To execute #3 and #4 in parallel, it is necessary to place them inside a second, nested ``parallel`` block within the if statement.
Particular care needs to be taken when working with ``parallel`` blocks which generate large numbers of RTIO events, as it is possible to create sequence errors. A sequence error is caused when the scalable event dispatcher (SED) cannot queue an RTIO event due to its timestamp being the same as or earlier than another event in its queue. By default, the SED has 8 lanes, which suffice in most cases to avoid sequence errors; however, if many (>8) events are queued with interlaced timestamps the problem can still surface. See :ref:`sequence-errors`.
Note that for performance reasons sequence errors do not halt execution of the kernel. Instead, they are reported in the core log. If the ``aqctl_corelog`` process has been started with ``artiq_ctlmgr``, then these errors will be posted to the master log. If an experiment is executed through ``artiq_run``, the errors will only be visible in the core log.
Sequence errors can usually be overcome by reordering the generation of the events (again, different from and unrelated to reordering the events themselves). Alternatively, the number of SED lanes can be increased in the gateware.
The core device records the real-time I/O waveforms into a circular buffer. It is possible to dump any Python object so that it appears alongside the waveforms using the ``rtio_log`` function, which accepts a channel name (i.e. a log target) as the first argument: ::
When using ``artiq_run``, the recorded data can be extracted using ``artiq_coreanalyzer``(see :ref:`core-device-rtio-analyzer-tool`). To export it to VCD, which can be viewed using third-party tools such as GtkWave, use the command ``artiq_coreanalyzer -w rtio.vcd``. Recorded data can also be viewed directly with the ARTIQ dashboard, which will be presented later in :doc:`getting_started_mgmt`.
DMA allows for storing fixed sequences of RTIO events in system memory and having the DMA core in the FPGA play them back at high speed. Provided that the specifications of a desired event sequence are known far enough in advance, and no other RTIO issues (collisions, sequence errors) are provoked, even extremely fast and detailed event sequences are always possible to generate and execute. However, if they are time-consuming for the CPU to generate, they may require very large amounts of positive slack in order to allow the CPU enough time to complete the generation before the wall clock 'catches up' (that is, without running into RTIO underflows). A better option is to record these sequences to the DMA core. Once recorded, events sequences are fixed and cannot be modified, but can be safely replayed at any position in the timeline, potentially repeatedly.
