Here using `"C"` the compiler will use `"aapcs"` or `"aapcs-vfp"`
depending on target configuration.
Of course this translates in a call to `__aeabi_fdiv` / `__aeabi_fmul`
on non-HF targets.
On `eabi` targets with +vfpv2/vfpv3 LLVM generate:
vmov s0, r1
vmov s2, r0
vdiv.f32 s0, s2, s0
vmov r0, s0
bx lr
On `eabihf` targets with +vfpv3-d16/d32/f32 +fp-only-sp LLVM generate:
vdiv.f32 s0, s0, s1
bx lr
That's exactly what We need for [div/mul][s/d]f3vfp.S
* I believe `__gtdf2` erroneously used `f32` instead of `f64`
* Most of these needed `#[arm_aeabi_alias]` to ensure they're correctly called
through the alias
* Some existing aliases were corrected with the right names
Note that this changes semantics:
pub extern "C" fn __eqsf2(a: f32, b: f32) -> bool {
cmp(a, b).to_le_abi() != 0
}
is not the same as
pub extern "C" fn __eqsf2(a: f32, b: f32) -> i32 {
cmp(a, b).to_le_abi()
}
However, compiler-rt does the latter, so this is actually
an improvement.
Use the "volatile" option and the "memory" clobber on inline asm that does
things like return directly, to reduce the chances of compilers rearranging
the code.
This commit prepares the build script for a wasm32 target that doesn't use
Emcripten, notably forcing the `mem` feature to get activated and forcibly
ignoring the `c` feature, even if activated, for the wasm32 target.
It looks like the old `__rust_probestack` routine is incompatible with newer
linux kernels. My best guess for this is that the kernel's auto-growth logic is
failing to trigger, causing what looks like a legitimate segfault to get
delivered. My best guess for why *that's* happening is that the faulting address
is below `%rsp`, whereas previously all faulting stack addresses were above
`%rsp`. The probestack routine does not modify `%rsp` as it's probing the stack,
and presumably newer kernels are interpreting this as a legitimate violation.
This commit tweaks the probestack routine to instead update `%rsp` incrementally
as probing happens. The ABI of the function, however, requires that `%rsp`
isn't changed as part of the function so it's restored at the end to the
previous value.
Although compiler-rt presumably has a more optimized implementation written in
assembly, it appears buggy for whatever reason, causing #173.
For now let's see if integration into rust-lang/rust will work with the
Rust-defined implementation!
Paolo Teti
Alex Crichton
whitequark
Marco A L Barbosa
Amanieu d'Antras
Scott McMurray
Dan Gohman
Oliver Geller
est31
Matt Ickstadt
Tim Neumann
Oliver Middleton
Jorge Aparicio