The central part of our code is our ``LED`` class, which derives from :class:`artiq.language.environment.EnvExperiment`. Among other features, :class:`~artiq.language.environment.EnvExperiment` calls our :meth:`~artiq.language.environment.Experiment.build` method and provides the :meth:`~artiq.language.environment.HasEnvironment.setattr_device` method that interfaces to the device database to create the appropriate device drivers and make those drivers accessible as ``self.core`` and ``self.led``. The :func:`~artiq.language.core.kernel` decorator (``@kernel``) tells the system that the :meth:`~artiq.language.environment.Experiment.run` method must be compiled for and executed on the core device (instead of being interpreted and executed as regular Python code on the host). The decorator uses ``self.core`` internally, which is why we request the core device using :meth:`~artiq.language.environment.HasEnvironment.setattr_device` like any other.
Copy the file ``device_db.py`` (containing the device database) from the ``examples/master`` folder of ARTIQ into the same directory as ``led.py`` (alternatively, you can use the ``--device-db`` option of ``artiq_run``). You will probably want to set the IP address of the core device in ``device_db.py`` so that the computer can connect to it (it is the ``host`` parameter of the ``comm`` entry). See :ref:`device-db` for more information. The example device database is designed for the ``nist_clock`` hardware adapter on the KC705; see :ref:`board-ports` for RTIO channel assignments if you need to adapt the device database to a different hardware platform.
A method or function running on the core device (which we call a "kernel") may communicate with the host by calling non-kernel functions that may accept parameters and may return a value. The "remote procedure call" (RPC) mechanisms handle automatically the communication between the host and the device of which function to call, with which parameters, and what the returned value is.
What happens is the ARTIQ compiler notices that the :meth:`input_led_state` function does not have a ``@kernel`` decorator (:func:`~artiq.language.core.kernel`) and thus must be executed on the host. When the core device calls it, it sends a request to the host to execute it. The host displays the prompt, collects user input, and sends the result back to the core device, which sets the LED state accordingly.
RPC functions must always return a value of the same type. When they return a value that is not ``None``, the compiler should be informed in advance of the type of the value, which is what the ``-> TBool`` annotation is for.
Without the :meth:`~artiq.coredevice.core.Core.break_realtime` call, the RTIO events emitted by :func:`self.led.on()` or :func:`self.led.off()` would be scheduled at a fixed and very short delay after entering :meth:`~artiq.language.environment.Experiment.run()`.
These events would fail because the RPC to :meth:`input_led_state()` can take an arbitrary amount of time and therefore the deadline for submission of RTIO events would have long passed when :func:`self.led.on()` or :func:`self.led.off()` are called.
The :meth:`~artiq.coredevice.core.Core.break_realtime` call is necessary to waive the real-time requirements of the LED state change.
The point of running code on the core device is the ability to meet demanding real-time constraints. In particular, the core device can respond to an incoming stimulus or the result of a measurement with a low and predictable latency. We will see how to use inputs later; first, we must familiarize ourselves with how time is managed in kernels.
Create a new file ``rtio.py`` containing the following: ::
In its :meth:`~artiq.language.environment.Experiment.build` method, the experiment obtains the core device and a TTL device called ``ttl0`` as defined in the device database.
In ARTIQ, TTL is used roughly synonymous with "a single generic digital signal" and does not refer to a specific signaling standard or voltage/current levels.
When :meth:`~artiq.language.environment.Experiment.run`, the experiment first ensures that ``ttl0`` is in output mode and actively driving the device it is connected to.
Bidirectional TTL channels (i.e. :class:`~artiq.coredevice.ttl.TTLInOut`) are in input (high impedance) mode by default, output-only TTL channels (:class:`~artiq.coredevice.ttl.TTLOut`) are always in output mode.
The experiment then drives one million 2 µs long pulses separated by 2 µs each.
Connect an oscilloscope or logic analyzer to TTL0 and run ``artiq_run.py rtio.py``.
Notice that the generated signal's period is precisely 4 µs, and that it has a duty cycle of precisely 50%.
This is not what you would expect if the delay and the pulse were implemented with register-based general purpose input output (GPIO) that is CPU-controlled.
The signal's period would depend on CPU speed, and overhead from the loop, memory management, function calls, etc, all of which are hard to predict and variable.
Any asymmetry in the overhead would manifest itself in a distorted and variable duty cycle.
Instead, inside the core device, output timing is generated by the gateware and the CPU only programs switching commands with certain timestamps that the CPU computes.
This guarantees precise timing as long as the CPU can keep generating timestamps that are increasing fast enough. In case it fails to do that (and attempts to program an event with a timestamp smaller than the current RTIO clock timestamp), a :exc:`~artiq.coredevice.exceptions.RTIOUnderflow` exception is raised. The kernel causing it may catch it (using a regular ``try... except...`` construct), or it will be propagated to the host.
Try reducing the period of the generated waveform until the CPU cannot keep up with the generation of switching events and the underflow exception is raised. Then try catching it: ::
It is often necessary that several pulses overlap one another. This can be expressed through the use of ``with parallel`` constructs, in which the events generated by the individual statements are executed at the same time. The duration of the ``parallel`` block is the duration of its longest statement.
ARTIQ can implement ``with parallel`` blocks without having to resort to any of the typical parallel processing approaches.
It simply remembers the position on the timeline when entering the ``parallel`` block and then seeks back to that position after submitting the events generated by each statement.
In other words, the statements in the ``parallel`` block are actually executed sequentially, only the RTIO events generated by them are scheduled to be executed in parallel.
Note that if a statement takes a lot of CPU time to execute (this different from the events scheduled by a statement taking a long time), it may cause a subsequent statement to miss the deadline for timely submission of its events.
Within a parallel block, some statements can be made sequential again using a ``with sequential`` construct. Observe the pulses generated by this code: ::
Particular care needs to be taken when working with ``parallel`` blocks in cases where a large number of RTIO events are generated as it possible to create sequencing errors (`RTIO sequence error`). Sequence errors do not halt execution of the kernel for performance reasons and instead are reported in the core log. If the ``aqctl_corelog`` process has been started with ``artiq_ctlmgr``, then these errors will be posted to the master log. However, if an experiment is executed through ``artiq_run``, these errors will not be visible outside of the core log.
A sequence error is caused when the scalable event dispatcher (SED) cannot queue an RTIO event due to its timestamp being the same as or earlier than another event in its queue. By default, the SED has 8 lanes which allows ``parallel`` events to work without sequence errors in most cases, however if many (>8) events are queued with conflicting timestamps this error can surface.
These errors can usually be overcome by reordering the generation of the events. Alternatively, the number of SED lanes can be increased in the gateware.
The core device records the real-time I/O waveforms into a circular buffer. It is possible to dump any Python object so that it appears alongside the waveforms using the ``rtio_log`` function, which accepts a channel name (i.e. a log target) as the first argument: ::
from artiq.experiment import *
class Tutorial(EnvExperiment):
def build(self):
self.setattr_device("core")
self.setattr_device("ttl0")
@kernel
def run(self):
self.core.reset()
for i in range(100):
self.ttl0.pulse(...)
rtio_log("ttl0", "i", i)
delay(...)
Afterwards, the recorded data can be extracted and written to a VCD file using ``artiq_coreanalyzer -w rtio.vcd`` (see: :ref:`core-device-rtio-analyzer-tool`). VCD files can be viewed using third-party tools such as GtkWave.
DMA allows you to store fixed sequences of pulses in system memory, and have the DMA core in the FPGA play them back at high speed. Pulse sequences that are too fast for the CPU (i.e. would cause RTIO underflows) can still be generated using DMA. The only modification of the sequence that the DMA core supports is shifting it in time (so it can be played back at any position of the timeline), everything else is fixed at the time of recording the sequence.
Try this: ::
from artiq.experiment import *
class DMAPulses(EnvExperiment):
def build(self):
self.setattr_device("core")
self.setattr_device("core_dma")
self.setattr_device("ttl0")
@kernel
def record(self):
with self.core_dma.record("pulses"):
# all RTIO operations now go to the "pulses"
# DMA buffer, instead of being executed immediately.
By default on DRTIO systems, all events recorded by the DMA core are kept and played back on the master.
With distributed DMA, RTIO events that should be played back on remote destinations, are distributed to the corresponding satellites. In some cases (typically, large buffers on several satellites with high event throughput), it allows for better performance and higher bandwidth, as the RTIO events do not have to be sent over the DRTIO link(s) during playback.
To enable distributed DMA, simply provide an ``enable_ddma=True`` argument for the :meth:`~artiq.coredevice.dma.CoreDMA.record` method - taking a snippet from the previous example: ::
@kernel
def record(self):
with self.core_dma.record("pulses", enable_ddma=True):
# all RTIO operations now go to the "pulses"
# DMA buffer, instead of being executed immediately.
for i in range(50):
self.ttl0.pulse(100*ns)
delay(100*ns)
This argument is ignored on standalone systems, as it does not apply there.
Enabling DDMA on a purely local sequence on a DRTIO system introduces an overhead during trace recording which comes from additional processing done on the record, so careful use is advised.
Due to the extra time that communicating with relevant satellites takes, an additional delay before playback may be necessary to prevent a :exc:`~artiq.coredevice.exceptions.RTIOUnderflow` when playing back a DDMA-enabled sequence.
Subkernels
----------
Subkernels refer to kernels running on a satellite device. This allows you to offload some of the processing and control over remote RTIO devices, freeing up resources on the master.
Subkernels behave in most part as regular kernels, they accept arguments and can return values. However, there are few caveats:
- their return value must be fully annotated with an ARTIQ type,
- their arguments should be annotated, and only basic ARTIQ types are supported,
- while ``self`` is allowed, there is no attribute writeback - any changes to it will be discarded when the subkernel is done,
- they can raise exceptions, but they cannot be caught by the master,
- they begin execution as soon as possible when called, and they can be awaited.
To define a subkernel, use the subkernel decorator (``@subkernel(destination=X)``). The destination is the satellite number as defined in the routing table, and must be between 1 and 255. To call a subkernel, call it like a normal function; and to await its result, use ``subkernel_await(function, [timeout])`` built-in function.
For example, a subkernel performing integer addition: ::
Sometimes the subkernel execution may take more time - and the await has a default timeout of 10000 milliseconds (10 seconds). It can be adjusted, as ``subkernel_await()`` accepts an optional timeout argument.
Subkernels are compiled after the main kernel, and then immediately uploaded to satellites. When called, master instructs the appropriate satellite to load the subkernel into their kernel core and to run it. If the subkernel is complex, and its binary relatively big, the delay between the call and actually running the subkernel may be substantial; if that delay has to be minimized, ``subkernel_preload(function)`` should be used before the call.
While ``self`` is accepted as an argument for subkernels, it is embedded into the compiled data. Any changes made by the main kernel or other subkernels, will not be available.
Without the preload, the delay after the core reset would need to be longer. It's still an operation that can take some time, depending on the connection. Notice that the method ``pulse_ttl()`` can be also called both within a subkernel, and on its own.
In general, subkernels do not have to be awaited, but awaiting is required to retrieve returned values and exceptions.
..note::
When a subkernel is running, regardless of devices used by it, RTIO devices on that satellite are not available to the master. Control is returned to master after the subkernel finishes - to be sure that you can use the device, the subkernel should be awaited before any RTIO operations on the affected satellite are performed.
