document 1-EEM vs. 2-EEM mode in Urukul #38

Closed
opened 2022-03-15 12:54:21 +08:00 by sb10q · 3 comments
Owner
No description provided.
Member
f5ce9e19e9
Author
Owner

"ARTIQ & the core device (Kasli/Kasli-SoC) will never interact with these signals." ?

"ARTIQ \& the core device (Kasli/Kasli-SoC) will never interact with these signals." ?
Author
Owner

I don't think anything supports this mode, and in all current deployments those signals are driven by Kasli/Kasli-SoC and controlled by ARTIQ. I suggest removing such mentions from the document since it's merely confusing.

I don't think anything supports this mode, and in all current deployments those signals are driven by Kasli/Kasli-SoC and controlled by ARTIQ. I suggest removing such mentions from the document since it's merely confusing.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: sinara-hw/datasheets#38
No description provided.