Update one-eem mode on Urukul
Signed-off-by: Egor Savkin <es@m-labs.hk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
65d73c6cff
commit
401c65d4f1
|
@ -35,9 +35,11 @@ There is no intrinsic impact on Urukul output phase noise and the synchronizatio
|
||||||
Users may choose to use only one EEM port, if they want more cards to be in their crate. However following features
|
Users may choose to use only one EEM port, if they want more cards to be in their crate. However following features
|
||||||
will become unavailable:
|
will become unavailable:
|
||||||
* SU-Servo
|
* SU-Servo
|
||||||
* RF switch control
|
* Low-latency RF switch control
|
||||||
* Synchronization
|
* Synchronization
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
RF switches are still available but the commands need to go over the SPI bus so it's higher-latency and lower-resolution.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Urukul 4412
|
### Urukul 4412
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Urukul 4412 has higher frequency resolution (47 bit against 32 at Urukul 4410), however lacks such features:
|
Urukul 4412 has higher frequency resolution (47 bit against 32 at Urukul 4410), however lacks such features:
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue