NAL should be removed #8

Open
opened 2021-04-21 10:44:43 +08:00 by harry · 0 comments
Contributor

From my conversation with QUARTIQ's developers in https://github.com/quartiq/booster/pull/154/files, the smoltcp-nal crate is a smoltcp-compatible NAL and does not rely on minimq (for MQTT client) or Cortex-M (for timeouts). We have shown that there is no obvious reason to keep our own NAL, especially because it should not define or change any interactions with the ENC424J600 PHY.

From my conversation with QUARTIQ's developers in https://github.com/quartiq/booster/pull/154/files, the [`smoltcp-nal`](https://crates.io/crates/smoltcp-nal) crate is a smoltcp-compatible NAL and does not rely on minimq (for MQTT client) or Cortex-M (for timeouts). We have shown that there is no obvious reason to keep our own NAL, especially because it should not define or change any interactions with the ENC424J600 PHY.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: renet/ENC424J600#8
No description provided.