Update HVAMP32 according to the factual specs #155

Merged
sb10q merged 1 commits from esavkin/web2019:master into master 2024-12-20 11:16:03 +08:00
Member

@morgan noticed that specs were updated

@morgan noticed that specs were updated
Member

P.S. While OPA462 has the same pinout as LTC6090, they have different GBW and slew rate. Also the schematic didn't include OPA462 as an alternative.

  • LTC6090
    • GBW: 12 MHz
    • Slew rate: 21 V/µs
  • OPA462
    • GBW: 6.5 MHz
    • Slew rate: 25 V/µs
P.S. While OPA462 has the same pinout as LTC6090, they have different GBW and slew rate. Also the schematic didn't include OPA462 as an alternative. - LTC6090 - GBW: 12 MHz - Slew rate: 21 V/µs - OPA462 - GBW: 6.5 MHz - Slew rate: 25 V/µs
sb10q reviewed 2024-10-10 22:14:36 +08:00
@ -880,2 +880,2 @@
'Amplifier: LTC6090 or OPA462, 32 channels.',
'Amplification range up to ±25V and ±55V available.',
'Amplifier: LTC6090, 32 channels.',
'Amplification range up to ±50V and ±55V available.',
Owner

Are there really 50V and 55V variants? @morgan

Are there really 50V and 55V variants? @morgan
Member

Yes, from the latest release of HVAMP_32 v1.02rc there are 50V and 55V variant schematics. And the difference between them are the OP amp gain circuit (5x -> 5.5x gain) and the LDO resistive divider (HVout = ±56V -> ±57V).

Yes, from the latest release of HVAMP_32 [v1.02rc](https://github.com/sinara-hw/HVAMP_32/releases/tag/v1.02rc1) there are 50V and 55V variant schematics. And the difference between them are the OP amp gain circuit (5x -> 5.5x gain) and the LDO resistive divider (HVout = ±56V -> ±57V).
Owner

That doesn't make a lot of sense, please check with Greg.

That doesn't make a lot of sense, please check with Greg.
Member

Greg just replied, saying the latest v1.02 is a completely new design and the ±50V variant is indeed the standard variant. Also, they never produced the ±25V variant of v1.02. But he mentioned a way to convert existing v1.02 PCB to be ±25V variant.

""
For +/-25V you need to modify R1 to 30k*2.5
And R20/R35 to get +/- 28V supply
Also IC12/IC14 need to be removed and shorted by 0R resistors (R21,R25,R6,R8) because we would need +/-30V instead of+/- 60V
""

Greg just replied, saying the latest v1.02 is a completely new design and the ±50V variant is indeed the standard variant. Also, they never produced the ±25V variant of v1.02. But he mentioned a way to convert existing v1.02 PCB to be ±25V variant. "" For +/-25V you need to modify R1 to 30k*2.5 And R20/R35 to get +/- 28V supply Also IC12/IC14 need to be removed and shorted by 0R resistors (R21,R25,R6,R8) because we would need +/-30V instead of+/- 60V ""
Owner

OK then let's just mention the +-50V variant only.

OK then let's just mention the +-50V variant only.
esavkin force-pushed master from 893459396c to 130b8b67d9 2024-10-24 17:25:50 +08:00 Compare
sb10q merged commit 7220ee0e68 into master 2024-12-20 11:16:03 +08:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No Label
No Milestone
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: M-Labs/web2019#155
No description provided.