main: fix double brackets sent when socket rx ring buffer wraps around #55
@ -243,11 +243,8 @@ def main():
|
||||
lookback, noiseband, ch['interval'])
|
||||
|
||||
for data in tec.report_mode():
|
||||
try:
|
||||
|
||||
ch = data[channel]
|
||||
# Workaround for report_mode may yeild empty object
|
||||
except KeyError:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
temperature = ch['temperature']
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -213,9 +213,10 @@ fn main() -> ! {
|
||||
socket.close()
|
||||
} else if socket.can_send() && socket.can_recv() {
|
||||
match socket.recv(|buf| session.feed(buf)) {
|
||||
Ok(SessionInput::Nothing) => {
|
||||
send_line(&mut socket, b"{}");
|
||||
}
|
||||
// SessionInput::Nothing happens when socket RX ring buffer wraps around without
|
||||
|
||||
// the line reader reading a newline character, should do nothing and let
|
||||
// the line reader read from the start of ring buffer in the next loop cycle.
|
||||
Ok(SessionInput::Nothing) => {}
|
||||
Ok(SessionInput::Command(command)) => match command {
|
||||
Command::Quit =>
|
||||
socket.close(),
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Your code seems correct but this comment sounds inaccurate: isn't
SessionInput::Nothing
also returned in other situations, e.g. if you send a partial command without the newline (irrespective of whether the ring buffer wrapped around or not)?Hm, I have only considered the use case of using Netcat or the pytec client library to interface the device, where every command will always be followed by a newline.
What you just said is certainly true if someone decides to roll their own application to interface with the thermostat. I'll update the comment.
No they won't. TCP doesn't guarantee that data will not be fragmented. For instance, if one side of the transmission sends "1234" then the other may receive "12" first and then "34" later. TCP data should be treated as a pure stream.
Right, I am surprised this bug didn't occur more often then, given all the things that could have gone wrong.