Test dirty flags on all FAT variants

Flags field offset is different is it makes sense.
This commit is contained in:
Rafał Harabień 2018-06-29 15:38:27 +02:00
parent dc1ad7d2f7
commit 5dea8b5f8a

View File

@ -306,9 +306,7 @@ fn test_rename_file_fat32() {
call_with_fs(&test_rename_file, FAT32_IMG, 6)
}
#[test]
fn test_dirty_flag() {
call_with_tmp_img(&|tmp_path| {
fn test_dirty_flag(tmp_path: &str) {
// Open filesystem, make change, and forget it - should become dirty
let fs = open_filesystem_rw(tmp_path);
let status_flags = fs.read_status_flags().unwrap();
@ -327,5 +325,19 @@ fn test_dirty_flag() {
let status_flags = fs.read_status_flags().unwrap();
assert_eq!(status_flags.dirty(), true);
assert_eq!(status_flags.io_error(), false);
}, FAT32_IMG, 7);
}
#[test]
fn test_dirty_flag_fat12() {
call_with_tmp_img(&test_dirty_flag, FAT12_IMG, 7)
}
#[test]
fn test_dirty_flag_fat16() {
call_with_tmp_img(&test_dirty_flag, FAT16_IMG, 7)
}
#[test]
fn test_dirty_flag_fat32() {
call_with_tmp_img(&test_dirty_flag, FAT32_IMG, 7)
}