WIP: Adding static class attribute definition functionality #312
@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ pub fn get_exn_constructor(
|
||||
object_id: DefinitionId(class_id),
|
||||
type_vars: Default::default(),
|
||||
fields: exception_fields,
|
||||
static_fields: Default::default(),
|
||||
methods: vec![("__init__".into(), signature, DefinitionId(cons_id))],
|
||||
ancestors: vec![
|
||||
TypeAnnotation::CustomClass { id: DefinitionId(class_id), params: Default::default() },
|
||||
@ -175,6 +176,7 @@ pub fn get_builtins(primitives: &mut (PrimitiveStore, Unifier)) -> BuiltinInfo {
|
||||
type_vars: Default::default(),
|
||||
fields: exception_fields,
|
||||
methods: Default::default(),
|
||||
static_fields: Default::default(),
|
||||
ancestors: vec![],
|
||||
constructor: None,
|
||||
resolver: None,
|
||||
@ -200,6 +202,7 @@ pub fn get_builtins(primitives: &mut (PrimitiveStore, Unifier)) -> BuiltinInfo {
|
||||
object_id: DefinitionId(10),
|
||||
type_vars: vec![option_ty_var],
|
||||
fields: vec![],
|
||||
static_fields: vec![],
|
||||
methods: vec![
|
||||
("is_some".into(), is_some_ty.0, DefinitionId(11)),
|
||||
("is_none".into(), is_some_ty.0, DefinitionId(12)),
|
||||
|
@ -1040,6 +1040,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
|
||||
class_body_ast,
|
||||
_class_ancestor_def,
|
||||
class_fields_def,
|
||||
class_static_fields_def,
|
||||
|
||||
class_methods_def,
|
||||
class_type_vars_def,
|
||||
class_resolver,
|
||||
@ -1047,6 +1048,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
|
||||
object_id,
|
||||
ancestors,
|
||||
fields,
|
||||
static_fields,
|
||||
methods,
|
||||
resolver,
|
||||
type_vars,
|
||||
@ -1054,7 +1056,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
|
||||
} = &mut *class_def
|
||||
{
|
||||
if let ast::StmtKind::ClassDef { name, bases, body, .. } = &class_ast {
|
||||
(*object_id, *name, bases, body, ancestors, fields, methods, type_vars, resolver)
|
||||
(*object_id, *name, bases, body, ancestors, fields, static_fields, methods, type_vars, resolver)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
unreachable!("here must be class def ast");
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1268,7 +1270,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
|
||||
.unify(method_dummy_ty, method_type)
|
||||
.map_err(|e| e.to_display(unifier).to_string())?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ast::StmtKind::AnnAssign { target, annotation, value: None, .. } => {
|
||||
ast::StmtKind::AnnAssign { target, annotation, value, .. } => {
|
||||
sb10q
commented
What does "reset" mean? What does "reset" mean?
I don't see ``value`` being changed in that block of code
|
||||
if let ast::ExprKind::Name { id: attr, .. } = &target.node {
|
||||
if defined_fields.insert(attr.to_string()) {
|
||||
let dummy_field_type = unifier.get_dummy_var().0;
|
||||
@ -1294,6 +1296,9 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
|
||||
_ if core_config.kernel_ann.is_none() => (annotation, true),
|
||||
_ => continue, // ignore fields annotated otherwise
|
||||
};
|
||||
if let Option::Some(..) = &value{
|
||||
class_static_fields_def.push((*attr, dummy_field_type, mutable));
|
||||
sb10q
commented
Why must it? Why must it?
What happens if it isn't?
|
||||
}
|
||||
class_fields_def.push((*attr, dummy_field_type, mutable));
|
||||
|
||||
let parsed_annotation = parse_ast_to_type_annotation_kinds(
|
||||
@ -1324,7 +1329,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
|
||||
type_var_to_concrete_def.insert(dummy_field_type, parsed_annotation);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return Err(format!(
|
||||
"same class fields `{}` defined twice (at {})",
|
||||
"same class field `{}` defined twice (at {})",
|
||||
attr, target.location
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1335,7 +1340,27 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ast::StmtKind::Assign { .. } => {}, // we don't class attributes
|
||||
ast::StmtKind::Assign { targets, value, .. } => {
|
||||
for target in targets {
|
||||
if let ast::ExprKind::Name { id: attr, .. } = &target.node {
|
||||
if defined_fields.insert(attr.to_string()) {
|
||||
sb10q
commented
"Add assign branch"? "Add assign branch"?
This kind of narration should be in the PR description, not the code comments.
|
||||
let dummy_field_type = unifier.get_dummy_var().0;
|
||||
class_static_fields_def.push((*attr, dummy_field_type, true));
|
||||
class_fields_def.push((*attr, dummy_field_type, true));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return Err(format!(
|
||||
"same class field `{}` defined twice (at {})",
|
||||
attr, target.location
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return Err(format!(
|
||||
"unsupported statement type in class definition body (at {})",
|
||||
sb10q
commented
style, remove blank line here style, remove blank line here
|
||||
target.location
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
sb10q
commented
fields or field? fields or field?
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
ast::StmtKind::Pass { .. } => {}
|
||||
ast::StmtKind::Expr { value: _, .. } => {} // typically a docstring; ignoring all expressions matches CPython behavior
|
||||
_ => {
|
||||
@ -1516,6 +1541,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
|
||||
ancestors,
|
||||
methods,
|
||||
fields,
|
||||
static_fields,
|
||||
type_vars,
|
||||
name: class_name,
|
||||
object_id,
|
||||
@ -1618,11 +1644,11 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
|
||||
unreachable!("must be init function here")
|
||||
}
|
||||
let all_inited = Self::get_all_assigned_field(body.as_slice())?;
|
||||
for (f, _, _) in fields {
|
||||
if !all_inited.contains(f) {
|
||||
for f in fields {
|
||||
if !all_inited.contains(&f.0) && !static_fields.contains(&f) {
|
||||
return Err(format!(
|
||||
"fields `{}` of class `{}` not fully initialized in the initializer (at {})",
|
||||
f,
|
||||
&f.0,
|
||||
class_name,
|
||||
body[0].location,
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
|
||||
object_id: DefinitionId(index),
|
||||
type_vars: Default::default(),
|
||||
fields: Default::default(),
|
||||
static_fields: Default::default(),
|
||||
sb10q
commented
Is this any different than the other lines in this block of code, which don't have a comment? Is this any different than the other lines in this block of code, which don't have a comment?
|
||||
methods: Default::default(),
|
||||
ancestors: Default::default(),
|
||||
constructor,
|
||||
|
@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ pub enum TopLevelDef {
|
||||
// class fields
|
||||
// name, type, is mutable
|
||||
fields: Vec<(StrRef, Type, bool)>,
|
||||
// list of static data members
|
||||
static_fields: Vec<(StrRef, Type, bool)>,
|
||||
// class methods, pointing to the corresponding function definition.
|
||||
sb10q
commented
Misplaced comment. Misplaced comment.
|
||||
methods: Vec<(StrRef, Type, DefinitionId)>,
|
||||
// ancestor classes, including itself.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
What function?
Comment is incomprehensible.