nac3core: toplevel, fix for class constructors + spelling errors #263

Closed
wylited wants to merge 2 commits from iss221_noinit into master
2 changed files with 18 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
) -> Result<(StrRef, DefinitionId, Option<Type>), String> {
let defined_names = &mut self.defined_names;
match &ast.node {
ast::StmtKind::ClassDef { name: class_name, bases, body, .. } => {
ast::StmtKind::ClassDef { name: class_name, body, .. } => {
if self.keyword_list.contains(class_name) {
return Err(format!(
"cannot use keyword `{}` as a class name (at {})",
@ -221,18 +221,9 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
// we do not push anything to the def list, so we keep track of the index
// and then push in the correct order after the for loop
let mut class_method_index_offset = 0;
let init_id = "__init__".into();
let exception_id = "Exception".into();
// TODO: Fix this hack. We will generate constructor for classes that inherit
Review

@pca006132 What is the purpose of this hack?

@pca006132 What is the purpose of this hack?
Review

register_top_level will return Result<(StrRef, DefinitionId, Option<Type>), String>, where the third element of the tuple is the type of the function or constructor of the class (if there is any). If the class does not have a constructor, the third element will be None to avoid adding this to the symbol table. If the class inherits from Exception, we will need to generate a default constructor for it.

`register_top_level` will return `Result<(StrRef, DefinitionId, Option<Type>), String>`, where the third element of the tuple is the type of the function or constructor of the class (if there is any). If the class does not have a constructor, the third element will be None to avoid adding this to the symbol table. If the class inherits from `Exception`, we will need to generate a default constructor for it.
Review

We will generate or we are generating? I think this is already implemented?

We will generate or we are generating? I think this is already implemented?
// from Exception class (directly or indirectly), but this code cannot handle
// subclass of other exception classes.
let mut contains_constructor = bases
.iter().any(|base| matches!(base.node, ast::ExprKind::Name { id, .. } if id == exception_id));
for b in body {
if let ast::StmtKind::FunctionDef { name: method_name, .. } = &b.node {
if method_name == &init_id {
contains_constructor = true;
}
if self.keyword_list.contains(method_name) {
return Err(format!(
"cannot use keyword `{}` as a method name (at {})",
@ -298,7 +289,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
self.definition_ast_list.push((def, Some(ast)));
}
let result_ty = if contains_constructor { Some(constructor_ty) } else { None };
let result_ty = Some(constructor_ty);
Ok((class_name, DefinitionId(class_def_id), result_ty))
}
@ -1470,7 +1461,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
/// step 5, analyze and call type inferecer to fill the `instance_to_stmt` of topleveldef::function
fn analyze_function_instance(&mut self) -> Result<(), String> {
// first get the class contructor type correct for the following type check in function body
// first get the class constructor type correct for the following type check in function body
// also do class field instantiation check
let init_str_id = "__init__".into();
let mut definition_extension = Vec::new();
@ -1581,7 +1572,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
return Ok(());
}
let mut init_id: Option<DefinitionId> = None;
// get the class contructor type correct
// get the class constructor type correct
let (contor_args, contor_type_vars) = {
let mut constructor_args: Vec<FuncArg> = Vec::new();
let mut type_vars: HashMap<u32, Type> = HashMap::new();

View File

@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
@extern
def output_int32(x: int32):
...
class A:
def foo(self):
output_int32(1)
def run() -> int32:
inst = A()
inst.foo()
output_int32(1)
return 0