type of second operand of bitshifts #336

Closed
opened 2023-10-06 12:54:56 +08:00 by sb10q · 0 comments

Currently A << B and A >> B need A and B to be of the same type.

For int64 this means we need a 64-bit B. Does this make sense? Shouldn't it always be int32?

Currently ``A << B`` and ``A >> B`` need ``A`` and ``B`` to be of the same type. For ``int64`` this means we need a 64-bit ``B``. Does this make sense? Shouldn't it always be ``int32``?
sb10q closed this issue 2023-11-09 12:16:21 +08:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: M-Labs/nac3#336
There is no content yet.