removed locks in toplevelcomposer

This commit is contained in:
ychenfo 2021-08-17 16:36:06 +08:00
parent 276daa03f7
commit 619963dc8c

View File

@ -68,20 +68,10 @@ pub struct TopLevelContext {
pub unifiers: Arc<RwLock<Vec<(SharedUnifier, PrimitiveStore)>>>,
}
impl TopLevelContext {
pub fn get_def_list<'a>(&'a self) -> Vec<&'a TopLevelDef> {
let list = self.definitions.read();
let list = list.deref();
let list = list.iter().map(|x| {
x.read().deref()
}).collect::<Vec<_>>();
list
}
}
pub struct TopLevelComposer {
// list of top level definitions, same as top level context
pub definition_list: Arc<Vec<RwLock<TopLevelDef>>>,
pub definition_list: Arc<RwLock<Vec<RwLock<TopLevelDef>>>>,
// list of top level ast, the index is same as the field `definition_list`
pub ast_list: Vec<Option<ast::Stmt<()>>>,
// start as a primitive unifier, will add more top_level defs inside
@ -97,7 +87,7 @@ pub struct TopLevelComposer {
impl TopLevelComposer {
pub fn to_top_level_context(&self) -> TopLevelContext {
TopLevelContext {
definitions: RwLock::new(self.definition_list.).into(),
definitions: self.definition_list.clone(),
// FIXME: all the big unifier or?
unifiers: Default::default(),
}
@ -156,7 +146,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
let ast_list: Vec<Option<ast::Stmt<()>>> = vec![None, None, None, None, None];
let composer = TopLevelComposer {
definition_list: top_level_def_list,
definition_list: RwLock::new(top_level_def_list).into(),
ast_list,
primitives: primitives.0,
unifier: primitives.1.into(),
@ -212,7 +202,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
ast: ast::Stmt<()>,
resolver: Option<Arc<Mutex<dyn SymbolResolver + Send + Sync>>>,
) -> Result<(String, DefinitionId), String> {
let (mut def_list, mut ast_list) = (&mut self.definition_list, &mut self.ast_list);
let (mut def_list, ast_list) = (self.definition_list.write(), &mut self.ast_list);
assert_eq!(def_list.len(), ast_list.len());
@ -270,7 +260,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
ast_list.push(None);
// class, put its def_id into the to be analyzed set
let mut to_be_analyzed = self.to_be_analyzed_class;
let to_be_analyzed = &mut self.to_be_analyzed_class;
to_be_analyzed.push(DefinitionId(class_def_id));
Ok((class_name, DefinitionId(class_def_id)))
@ -296,9 +286,11 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
/// step 1, analyze the type vars associated with top level class
fn analyze_top_level_class_type_var(&mut self) -> Result<(), String> {
let mut def_list = &mut self.definition_list;
let mut def_list = self.definition_list.write();
let ast_list = &self.ast_list;
let mut unifier = &mut self.unifier;
let converted_top_level = &self.to_top_level_context();
let primitives = &self.primitives;
let unifier = &mut self.unifier;
for (class_def, class_ast) in def_list
.iter_mut()
@ -347,9 +339,9 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
.iter()
.map(|e| {
class_resolver.as_ref().unwrap().lock().parse_type_annotation(
&self.to_top_level_context(),
converted_top_level,
unifier.borrow_mut(),
&self.primitives,
primitives,
e,
)
})
@ -377,9 +369,9 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
} else {
let ty =
class_resolver.as_ref().unwrap().lock().parse_type_annotation(
&self.to_top_level_context(),
converted_top_level,
unifier.borrow_mut(),
&self.primitives,
primitives,
&slice,
)?;
// check if it is type var
@ -408,9 +400,11 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
/// if the type var associated with class `B` has not been handled properly,
/// the parse of type annotation of `B[int, bool]` will fail
fn analyze_top_level_class_bases(&mut self) -> Result<(), String> {
let mut def_list = &mut self.definition_list;
let mut def_list = self.definition_list.write();
let ast_list = &self.ast_list;
let mut unifier = &mut self.unifier;
let converted_top_level = &self.to_top_level_context();
let primitives = &self.primitives;
let unifier = &mut self.unifier;
for (class_def, class_ast) in def_list
.iter_mut()
@ -442,9 +436,9 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
}
// get the def id of the base class
let base_ty = class_resolver.as_ref().unwrap().lock().parse_type_annotation(
&self.to_top_level_context(),
converted_top_level,
unifier.borrow_mut(),
&self.primitives,
primitives,
b,
)?;
let base_id =
@ -463,11 +457,13 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
/// step 3, class fields and methods
fn analyze_top_level_class_fields_methods(&mut self) -> Result<(), String> {
let mut def_list = &mut self.definition_list;
let mut def_list = self.definition_list.write();
let ast_list = &self.ast_list;
let mut unifier = &mut self.unifier;
let converted_top_level = &self.to_top_level_context();
let class_method_to_def_id = &self.class_method_to_def_id;
let mut to_be_analyzed_class = &mut self.to_be_analyzed_class;
let primitives = &self.primitives;
let to_be_analyzed_class = &mut self.to_be_analyzed_class;
let unifier = &mut self.unifier;
while !to_be_analyzed_class.is_empty() {
let class_ind = to_be_analyzed_class.remove(0).0;
@ -544,9 +540,9 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
let ty =
class_resolver.as_ref().unwrap().lock().parse_type_annotation(
&self.to_top_level_context(),
converted_top_level,
unifier.borrow_mut(),
&self.primitives,
primitives,
annotation,
)?;
Ok(ty)
@ -562,9 +558,9 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
.as_ref()
.map(|x|
class_resolver.as_ref().unwrap().lock().parse_type_annotation(
&self.to_top_level_context(),
converted_top_level,
unifier.borrow_mut(),
&self.primitives,
primitives,
x.as_ref(),
)
)