M-Labs/nac3
M-Labs/nac3
8
1
Fork 12
Code Issues 98 Pull Requests 19 Releases Wiki Activity

start refactorinng for less redundancy

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
ychenfo 2021-08-17 14:01:18 +08:00
parent a94145348a
commit 276daa03f7
1 changed files with 35 additions and 23 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

58
nac3core/src/top_level.rs
View File

@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
use std::borrow::BorrowMut;
use std::ops::Deref;
use std::{collections::HashMap, collections::HashSet, sync::Arc};
use super::typecheck::type_inferencer::PrimitiveStore;
@ -67,25 +68,36 @@ pub struct TopLevelContext {
pub unifiers: Arc<RwLock<Vec<(SharedUnifier, PrimitiveStore)>>>,
}
impl TopLevelContext {
pub fn get_def_list<'a>(&'a self) -> Vec<&'a TopLevelDef> {
let list = self.definitions.read();
let list = list.deref();
let list = list.iter().map(|x| {
x.read().deref()
}).collect::<Vec<_>>();
list
}
}
pub struct TopLevelComposer {
// list of top level definitions, same as top level context
pub definition_list: Arc<RwLock<Vec<RwLock<TopLevelDef>>>>,
pub definition_list: Arc<Vec<RwLock<TopLevelDef>>>,
// list of top level ast, the index is same as the field `definition_list`
pub ast_list: RwLock<Vec<Option<ast::Stmt<()>>>>,
pub ast_list: Vec<Option<ast::Stmt<()>>>,
// start as a primitive unifier, will add more top_level defs inside
pub unifier: RwLock<Unifier>,
pub unifier: Unifier,
// primitive store
pub primitives: PrimitiveStore,
// mangled class method name to def_id
pub class_method_to_def_id: RwLock<HashMap<String, DefinitionId>>,
pub class_method_to_def_id: HashMap<String, DefinitionId>,
// record the def id of the classes whoses fields and methods are to be analyzed
pub to_be_analyzed_class: RwLock<Vec<DefinitionId>>,
pub to_be_analyzed_class: Vec<DefinitionId>,
}
impl TopLevelComposer {
pub fn to_top_level_context(&self) -> TopLevelContext {
TopLevelContext {
definitions: self.definition_list.clone(),
definitions: RwLock::new(self.definition_list.).into(),
// FIXME: all the big unifier or?
unifiers: Default::default(),
}
@ -144,8 +156,8 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
let ast_list: Vec<Option<ast::Stmt<()>>> = vec![None, None, None, None, None];
let composer = TopLevelComposer {
definition_list: RwLock::new(top_level_def_list).into(),
ast_list: RwLock::new(ast_list),
definition_list: top_level_def_list,
ast_list,
primitives: primitives.0,
unifier: primitives.1.into(),
class_method_to_def_id: Default::default(),
@ -200,7 +212,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
ast: ast::Stmt<()>,
resolver: Option<Arc<Mutex<dyn SymbolResolver + Send + Sync>>>,
) -> Result<(String, DefinitionId), String> {
let (mut def_list, mut ast_list) = (self.definition_list.write(), self.ast_list.write());
let (mut def_list, mut ast_list) = (&mut self.definition_list, &mut self.ast_list);
assert_eq!(def_list.len(), ast_list.len());
@ -229,7 +241,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
def_list.push(
Self::make_top_level_function_def(
fun_name.clone(),
self.unifier.write().add_ty(TypeEnum::TFunc(
self.unifier.add_ty(TypeEnum::TFunc(
FunSignature {
args: Default::default(),
ret: self.primitives.none,
@ -245,7 +257,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
ast_list.push(None);
// class method, do not let the symbol manager manage it, use our own map
self.class_method_to_def_id.write().insert(fun_name, DefinitionId(def_id));
self.class_method_to_def_id.insert(fun_name, DefinitionId(def_id));
}
}
@ -258,7 +270,7 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
ast_list.push(None);
// class, put its def_id into the to be analyzed set
let mut to_be_analyzed = self.to_be_analyzed_class.write();
let mut to_be_analyzed = self.to_be_analyzed_class;
to_be_analyzed.push(DefinitionId(class_def_id));
Ok((class_name, DefinitionId(class_def_id)))
@ -284,9 +296,9 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
/// step 1, analyze the type vars associated with top level class
fn analyze_top_level_class_type_var(&mut self) -> Result<(), String> {
let mut def_list = self.definition_list.write();
let ast_list = self.ast_list.read();
let mut unifier = self.unifier.write();
let mut def_list = &mut self.definition_list;
let ast_list = &self.ast_list;
let mut unifier = &mut self.unifier;
for (class_def, class_ast) in def_list
.iter_mut()
@ -396,9 +408,9 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
/// if the type var associated with class `B` has not been handled properly,
/// the parse of type annotation of `B[int, bool]` will fail
fn analyze_top_level_class_bases(&mut self) -> Result<(), String> {
let mut def_list = self.definition_list.write();
let ast_list = self.ast_list.read();
let mut unifier = self.unifier.write();
let mut def_list = &mut self.definition_list;
let ast_list = &self.ast_list;
let mut unifier = &mut self.unifier;
for (class_def, class_ast) in def_list
.iter_mut()
@ -451,11 +463,11 @@ impl TopLevelComposer {
/// step 3, class fields and methods
fn analyze_top_level_class_fields_methods(&mut self) -> Result<(), String> {
let mut def_list = self.definition_list.write();
let ast_list = self.ast_list.read();
let mut unifier = self.unifier.write();
let class_method_to_def_id = self.class_method_to_def_id.read();
let mut to_be_analyzed_class = self.to_be_analyzed_class.write();
let mut def_list = &mut self.definition_list;
let ast_list = &self.ast_list;
let mut unifier = &mut self.unifier;
let class_method_to_def_id = &self.class_method_to_def_id;
let mut to_be_analyzed_class = &mut self.to_be_analyzed_class;
while !to_be_analyzed_class.is_empty() {
let class_ind = to_be_analyzed_class.remove(0).0;