pca006132 84d09f1fd1 | ||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
examples | ||
README.md | ||
helper.py | ||
inference.py | ||
inheritance.py | ||
lifetime.py | ||
main.py | ||
parse_expr.py | ||
parse_stmt.py | ||
primitives.py | ||
test_expr.py | ||
test_inference.py | ||
test_stmt.py | ||
test_subst.py | ||
test_top_level.py | ||
top_level.py | ||
type_def.py |
README.md
Toy Implementation
Currently the rough implementation is done, works remain are the code for checking a real python script, getting the type variables, some implementation details etc.
These features are considered in the proposal, but would not be implemented here for simplicity reasons:
- Referencing Python Variables.
- Most of the types, only the following types are implemented:
int32
int64
float
bool
list[T]
tuple[T1,...]
virtual[T]
- Storing large constants as
uint32
,int64
oruint64
. - AugAssign,
a += b
etc. with
,try except
, etc.- const indexing with tuple.
- method override check modulo variable renaming.
- more complicated type guard
Running Example
python main.py example/a.py
Files
All files named test_xxx
are used for inspecting the result of algorithms, and
can be ignored for now.
Here is the list of files and their purpose:
helper.py
: mainly for the error definition.inference.py
: type-check for function invocation.inheritance.py
: perform method and field inheritance.main.py
: main script for checking an entire python script.parse_expr.py
: type-check for expressions in python AST.parse_stmt.py
: type-check for statements in python AST.primitives.py
: definition of primitives, operations, and built-in functions.top_level.py
: gather class, function and type variable definitions from python AST.type_def.py
: python class for various types.
Variable Scope
There is no shadowing in Python, so we decided that variables with the same name in a function must have the same type. For example, the following is not allowed:
if foo():
a = 1
else:
a = None
Also, as variables has to be well typed, they must be initialized before using them. If a variable could be not initialized in some code path, then it is not readable. The following is also not allowed:
if foo():
a = 1
a = a + 1
Generics
Generics are supported via type variables.
- Generic type variable:
A = TypeVar('A')
- Bounded type variable (
A
can either beT1
orT2
or ...):A = TypeVar('A', T1, T2, ...)
Note:
- In normal python, the bound of a type variable is actually about class inheritance. However, our type variable would be invariant and would not deal with subtyping.
- Type variables cannot contain any type variable in their bound. For example,
B = TypeVar('B', A, T3)
is not allowed.- I did not really check the difference between the variable name and the name parameter of
TypeVar
, so idk what would happen if they are different. Please don't do that right now, would be fixed in later more serious implementations.
We require the function to be well typed under every possible substitution of the type variables.
For generic type variables, you can't really do much with them, other than passing them around in parameters, dealing with their list, etc.
For bounded type variables, if an operation is supported by all the possible values of the variable, we can use that directly:
A = TypeVar('A', int32, int64)
def add(a: A, b: A) -> A:
return a + b
If an operation is supported by some possible values, we can use type guard:
A = TypeVar('A', int32, list[int32])
def add2(a: int32, b: A) -> a:
if type(b) == int32:
# b is int32 here
return a + b
else:
# b is list[int32] here
for x in b:
a = a + b
return a
Note that we only support very simple kinds of type guards in this toy implementation. More specifically, the type guard has to meet the following conditions:
- The if statement must be of the form
type(*) == **
ortype(*) != **
. For example,if type(b) == int32 or type(b) == list[int32]
is not allowed. - The type of
*
must be a type variable. For example,list[X]
is not allowed.
Substitution
The crucial constraint and assumption in our system is that, every (sub-)expressions must have their types fully determined, and cannot depend on statements/expressions after them. Hence, in a function call, every arguments are well typed. We only have to determine the substitution of type variables present in the function type signature that makes the type agree.
There is a tiny difference between unification and our implementation. In our implementation, the substitution would only be applied to the type signature of the target function call but not the variables present in the function call. This way we don't have to make the type variables in the callee fresh before doing unification.
Consider the following example:
X = TypeVar('X')
def head(a: list[X]) -> X:
return a[0]
head([1, 2, 3])
In this example, the expression [1, 2, 3]
has type list[int32]
, so the
algorithm tries to fit (list[int32])
into (list[X])
, giving a substitution
X -> int32
.
Substitution can also substitute variables into another variable. Consider the following example:
X = TypeVar('X')
Y = TypeVar('Y', int32, int64)
def head(a: list[X]) -> X:
return a[0]
def sum_of_heads(a: list[Y], b: list[Y]) -> Y:
return head(a) + head(b)
In this example, a
has type list[Y]
, so the algorithm would give a
substitution X -> Y
for the call head(a)
, and similarly for b
.
As Y
can only range over int32
and int64
, in the two instances of Y
,
the return statement would have type
int32 + int32 : int32 : Y
underY -> int32
, andint64 + int64 : int64 : Y
underY -> int64
. So the function is well typed.
Note that variables are fresh in every invocation. Consider the following example:
I = TypeVar('I', int32, list[int32])
def add(a: int32, b: I) -> int32:
if type(b) == int32:
return a + b
else:
# b must be list[int32] in this branch.
for x in b:
a = add(a, x)
return a
add(1, [1, 2, 3])
This one should type check. I -> list[int32]
only affects 1 call,
and the recursion inside could substitute I -> int32
.
Example of a failure case:
A = TypeVar('A')
B = TypeVar('B')
def foo(a: A, b: A):
pass
def bar(a: A, b: B):
foo(a, b)
This would fail. From the first argument, we have A -> A
, and from the second
argument we need A -> B
. In general, we may have A != B
, so there is no
substitution that meets the requirement and the type check failed.
Operator Overloading
Most operations are actually implemented via operator overloading. We currently support:
- Normal:
__init__
- Comparison:
__lt__
__le__
__gt__
__ge__
__eq__
__ne__
- Arithmetic:
__add__
__sub__
__mul__
__matmul__
__truediv__
__floordiv__
__mod__
__pow__
__lshift__
__rshift__
__and__
__or__
__xor__
__neg__
Builtin Functions
len(list[X]) -> int32
range(int32) -> list[int32]