Improve `__clzsi2` performance (#366)

master
Aaron Kutch 2020-07-28 13:09:18 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent f3846bc05d
commit f4c7940d3b
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
5 changed files with 206 additions and 89 deletions

143
src/int/leading_zeros.rs Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
// Note: these functions happen to produce the correct `usize::leading_zeros(0)` value
// without a explicit zero check. Zero is probably common enough that it could warrant
// adding a zero check at the beginning, but `__clzsi2` has a precondition that `x != 0`.
// Compilers will insert the check for zero in cases where it is needed.
/// Returns the number of leading binary zeros in `x`.
pub fn usize_leading_zeros_default(x: usize) -> usize {
// The basic idea is to test if the higher bits of `x` are zero and bisect the number
// of leading zeros. It is possible for all branches of the bisection to use the same
// code path by conditionally shifting the higher parts down to let the next bisection
// step work on the higher or lower parts of `x`. Instead of starting with `z == 0`
// and adding to the number of zeros, it is slightly faster to start with
// `z == usize::MAX.count_ones()` and subtract from the potential number of zeros,
// because it simplifies the final bisection step.
let mut x = x;
// the number of potential leading zeros
let mut z = usize::MAX.count_ones() as usize;
// a temporary
let mut t: usize;
#[cfg(target_pointer_width = "64")]
{
t = x >> 32;
if t != 0 {
z -= 32;
x = t;
}
}
#[cfg(any(target_pointer_width = "32", target_pointer_width = "64"))]
{
t = x >> 16;
if t != 0 {
z -= 16;
x = t;
}
}
t = x >> 8;
if t != 0 {
z -= 8;
x = t;
}
t = x >> 4;
if t != 0 {
z -= 4;
x = t;
}
t = x >> 2;
if t != 0 {
z -= 2;
x = t;
}
// the last two bisections are combined into one conditional
t = x >> 1;
if t != 0 {
z - 2
} else {
z - x
}
// We could potentially save a few cycles by using the LUT trick from
// "https://embeddedgurus.com/state-space/2014/09/
// fast-deterministic-and-portable-counting-leading-zeros/".
// However, 256 bytes for a LUT is too large for embedded use cases. We could remove
// the last 3 bisections and use this 16 byte LUT for the rest of the work:
//const LUT: [u8; 16] = [0, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4];
//z -= LUT[x] as usize;
//z
// However, it ends up generating about the same number of instructions. When benchmarked
// on x86_64, it is slightly faster to use the LUT, but this is probably because of OOO
// execution effects. Changing to using a LUT and branching is risky for smaller cores.
}
// The above method does not compile well on RISC-V (because of the lack of predicated
// instructions), producing code with many branches or using an excessively long
// branchless solution. This method takes advantage of the set-if-less-than instruction on
// RISC-V that allows `(x >= power-of-two) as usize` to be branchless.
/// Returns the number of leading binary zeros in `x`.
pub fn usize_leading_zeros_riscv(x: usize) -> usize {
let mut x = x;
// the number of potential leading zeros
let mut z = usize::MAX.count_ones() as usize;
// a temporary
let mut t: usize;
// RISC-V does not have a set-if-greater-than-or-equal instruction and
// `(x >= power-of-two) as usize` will get compiled into two instructions, but this is
// still the most optimal method. A conditional set can only be turned into a single
// immediate instruction if `x` is compared with an immediate `imm` (that can fit into
// 12 bits) like `x < imm` but not `imm < x` (because the immediate is always on the
// right). If we try to save an instruction by using `x < imm` for each bisection, we
// have to shift `x` left and compare with powers of two approaching `usize::MAX + 1`,
// but the immediate will never fit into 12 bits and never save an instruction.
#[cfg(target_pointer_width = "64")]
{
// If the upper 32 bits of `x` are not all 0, `t` is set to `1 << 5`, otherwise
// `t` is set to 0.
t = ((x >= (1 << 32)) as usize) << 5;
// If `t` was set to `1 << 5`, then the upper 32 bits are shifted down for the
// next step to process.
x >>= t;
// If `t` was set to `1 << 5`, then we subtract 32 from the number of potential
// leading zeros
z -= t;
}
#[cfg(any(target_pointer_width = "32", target_pointer_width = "64"))]
{
t = ((x >= (1 << 16)) as usize) << 4;
x >>= t;
z -= t;
}
t = ((x >= (1 << 8)) as usize) << 3;
x >>= t;
z -= t;
t = ((x >= (1 << 4)) as usize) << 2;
x >>= t;
z -= t;
t = ((x >= (1 << 2)) as usize) << 1;
x >>= t;
z -= t;
t = (x >= (1 << 1)) as usize;
x >>= t;
z -= t;
// All bits except the LSB are guaranteed to be zero for this final bisection step.
// If `x != 0` then `x == 1` and subtracts one potential zero from `z`.
z - x
}
intrinsics! {
#[maybe_use_optimized_c_shim]
#[cfg(any(
target_pointer_width = "16",
target_pointer_width = "32",
target_pointer_width = "64"
))]
/// Returns the number of leading binary zeros in `x`.
pub extern "C" fn __clzsi2(x: usize) -> usize {
if cfg!(any(target_arch = "riscv32", target_arch = "riscv64")) {
usize_leading_zeros_riscv(x)
} else {
usize_leading_zeros_default(x)
}
}
}

View File

@ -13,11 +13,14 @@ macro_rules! os_ty {
}
pub mod addsub;
pub mod leading_zeros;
pub mod mul;
pub mod sdiv;
pub mod shift;
pub mod udiv;
pub use self::leading_zeros::__clzsi2;
/// Trait for some basic operations on integers
pub(crate) trait Int:
Copy
@ -300,69 +303,3 @@ macro_rules! impl_wide_int {
impl_wide_int!(u32, u64, 32);
impl_wide_int!(u64, u128, 64);
intrinsics! {
#[maybe_use_optimized_c_shim]
#[cfg(any(
target_pointer_width = "16",
target_pointer_width = "32",
target_pointer_width = "64"
))]
pub extern "C" fn __clzsi2(x: usize) -> usize {
// TODO: const this? Would require const-if
// Note(Lokathor): the `intrinsics!` macro can't process mut inputs
let mut x = x;
let mut y: usize;
let mut n: usize = {
#[cfg(target_pointer_width = "64")]
{
64
}
#[cfg(target_pointer_width = "32")]
{
32
}
#[cfg(target_pointer_width = "16")]
{
16
}
};
#[cfg(target_pointer_width = "64")]
{
y = x >> 32;
if y != 0 {
n -= 32;
x = y;
}
}
#[cfg(any(target_pointer_width = "32", target_pointer_width = "64"))]
{
y = x >> 16;
if y != 0 {
n -= 16;
x = y;
}
}
y = x >> 8;
if y != 0 {
n -= 8;
x = y;
}
y = x >> 4;
if y != 0 {
n -= 4;
x = y;
}
y = x >> 2;
if y != 0 {
n -= 2;
x = y;
}
y = x >> 1;
if y != 0 {
n - 2
} else {
n - x
}
}
}

View File

@ -11,6 +11,12 @@ doctest = false
[build-dependencies]
rand = "0.7"
[dev-dependencies]
# For fuzzing tests we want a deterministic seedable RNG. We also eliminate potential
# problems with system RNGs on the variety of platforms this crate is tested on.
# `xoshiro128**` is used for its quality, size, and speed at generating `u32` shift amounts.
rand_xoshiro = "0.4"
[dependencies.compiler_builtins]
path = ".."
default-features = false

View File

@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
extern crate compiler_builtins;
use compiler_builtins::int::__clzsi2;
#[test]
fn __clzsi2_test() {
let mut i: usize = core::usize::MAX;
// Check all values above 0
while i > 0 {
assert_eq!(__clzsi2(i) as u32, i.leading_zeros());
i >>= 1;
}
// check 0 also
i = 0;
assert_eq!(__clzsi2(i) as u32, i.leading_zeros());
// double check for bit patterns that aren't just solid 1s
i = 1;
for _ in 0..63 {
assert_eq!(__clzsi2(i) as u32, i.leading_zeros());
i <<= 2;
i += 1;
}
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
use rand_xoshiro::rand_core::{RngCore, SeedableRng};
use rand_xoshiro::Xoshiro128StarStar;
use compiler_builtins::int::__clzsi2;
use compiler_builtins::int::leading_zeros::{
usize_leading_zeros_default, usize_leading_zeros_riscv,
};
#[test]
fn __clzsi2_test() {
// Binary fuzzer. We cannot just send a random number directly to `__clzsi2()`, because we need
// large sequences of zeros to test. This XORs, ANDs, and ORs random length strings of 1s to
// `x`. ORs insure sequences of ones, ANDs insures sequences of zeros, and XORs are not often
// destructive but add entropy.
let mut rng = Xoshiro128StarStar::seed_from_u64(0);
let mut x = 0usize;
// creates a mask for indexing the bits of the type
let bit_indexing_mask = usize::MAX.count_ones() - 1;
// 10000 iterations is enough to make sure edge cases like single set bits are tested and to go
// through many paths.
for _ in 0..10_000 {
let r0 = bit_indexing_mask & rng.next_u32();
// random length of ones
let ones: usize = !0 >> r0;
let r1 = bit_indexing_mask & rng.next_u32();
// random circular shift
let mask = ones.rotate_left(r1);
match rng.next_u32() % 4 {
0 => x |= mask,
1 => x &= mask,
// both 2 and 3 to make XORs as common as ORs and ANDs combined
_ => x ^= mask,
}
let lz = x.leading_zeros() as usize;
let lz0 = __clzsi2(x);
let lz1 = usize_leading_zeros_default(x);
let lz2 = usize_leading_zeros_riscv(x);
if lz0 != lz {
panic!("__clzsi2({}): expected: {}, found: {}", x, lz, lz0);
}
if lz1 != lz {
panic!(
"usize_leading_zeros_default({}): expected: {}, found: {}",
x, lz, lz1
);
}
if lz2 != lz {
panic!(
"usize_leading_zeros_riscv({}): expected: {}, found: {}",
x, lz, lz2
);
}
}
}