2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
// Copyright 2017 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
|
|
|
|
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
|
|
|
|
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
|
|
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
|
|
|
|
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
|
|
|
|
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
|
|
|
|
// except according to those terms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//! This module defines the `__rust_probestack` intrinsic which is used in the
|
|
|
|
//! implementation of "stack probes" on certain platforms.
|
|
|
|
//!
|
|
|
|
//! The purpose of a stack probe is to provide a static guarantee that if a
|
|
|
|
//! thread has a guard page then a stack overflow is guaranteed to hit that
|
|
|
|
//! guard page. If a function did not have a stack probe then there's a risk of
|
|
|
|
//! having a stack frame *larger* than the guard page, so a function call could
|
|
|
|
//! skip over the guard page entirely and then later hit maybe the heap or
|
|
|
|
//! another thread, possibly leading to security vulnerabilities such as [The
|
|
|
|
//! Stack Clash], for example.
|
|
|
|
//!
|
|
|
|
//! [The Stack Clash]: https://blog.qualys.com/securitylabs/2017/06/19/the-stack-clash
|
|
|
|
//!
|
|
|
|
//! The `__rust_probestack` is called in the prologue of functions whose stack
|
|
|
|
//! size is larger than the guard page, for example larger than 4096 bytes on
|
|
|
|
//! x86. This function is then responsible for "touching" all pages relevant to
|
|
|
|
//! the stack to ensure that that if any of them are the guard page we'll hit
|
|
|
|
//! them guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
//!
|
|
|
|
//! The precise ABI for how this function operates is defined by LLVM. There's
|
|
|
|
//! no real documentation as to what this is, so you'd basically need to read
|
|
|
|
//! the LLVM source code for reference. Often though the test cases can be
|
|
|
|
//! illuminating as to the ABI that's generated, or just looking at the output
|
|
|
|
//! of `llc`.
|
|
|
|
//!
|
|
|
|
//! Note that `#[naked]` is typically used here for the stack probe because the
|
|
|
|
//! ABI corresponds to no actual ABI.
|
|
|
|
//!
|
|
|
|
//! Finally it's worth noting that at the time of this writing LLVM only has
|
|
|
|
//! support for stack probes on x86 and x86_64. There's no support for stack
|
|
|
|
//! probes on any other architecture like ARM or PowerPC64. LLVM I'm sure would
|
|
|
|
//! be more than welcome to accept such a change!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#![cfg(not(windows))] // Windows already has builtins to do this
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[naked]
|
2017-07-08 02:20:04 +08:00
|
|
|
#[cfg_attr(not(feature = "mangled-names"), no_mangle)]
|
2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
#[cfg(target_arch = "x86_64")]
|
|
|
|
pub unsafe extern fn __rust_probestack() {
|
|
|
|
// Our goal here is to touch each page between %rsp+8 and %rsp+8-%rax,
|
|
|
|
// ensuring that if any pages are unmapped we'll make a page fault.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// The ABI here is that the stack frame size is located in `%eax`. Upon
|
|
|
|
// return we're not supposed to modify `%esp` or `%eax`.
|
|
|
|
asm!("
|
2017-07-08 01:16:03 +08:00
|
|
|
mov %rax,%r11 // duplicate %rax as we're clobbering %r11
|
2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-08 01:16:03 +08:00
|
|
|
// Main loop, taken in one page increments. We're decrementing rsp by
|
2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
// a page each time until there's less than a page remaining. We're
|
|
|
|
// guaranteed that this function isn't called unless there's more than a
|
2017-07-08 01:16:03 +08:00
|
|
|
// page needed.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Note that we're also testing against `8(%rsp)` to account for the 8
|
|
|
|
// bytes pushed on the stack orginally with our return address. Using
|
|
|
|
// `8(%rsp)` simulates us testing the stack pointer in the caller's
|
|
|
|
// context.
|
2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
2:
|
2017-07-08 01:16:03 +08:00
|
|
|
sub $$0x1000,%rsp
|
|
|
|
test %rsp,8(%rsp)
|
2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
sub $$0x1000,%r11
|
2017-07-08 01:16:03 +08:00
|
|
|
cmp $$0x1000,%r11
|
2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
ja 2b
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Finish up the last remaining stack space requested, getting the last
|
2017-07-08 01:16:03 +08:00
|
|
|
// bits out of r11
|
|
|
|
sub %r11,%rsp
|
|
|
|
test %rsp,8(%rsp)
|
2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-08 01:16:03 +08:00
|
|
|
// Restore the stack pointer to what it previously was when entering
|
|
|
|
// this function. The caller will readjust the stack pointer after we
|
|
|
|
// return.
|
|
|
|
add %rax,%rsp
|
2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ret
|
|
|
|
");
|
|
|
|
::core::intrinsics::unreachable();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[naked]
|
2017-07-08 02:20:04 +08:00
|
|
|
#[cfg_attr(not(feature = "mangled-names"), no_mangle)]
|
2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
#[cfg(target_arch = "x86")]
|
|
|
|
pub unsafe extern fn __rust_probestack() {
|
|
|
|
// This is the same as x86_64 above, only translated for 32-bit sizes. Note
|
|
|
|
// that on Unix we're expected to restore everything as it was, this
|
|
|
|
// function basically can't tamper with anything.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// The ABI here is the same as x86_64, except everything is 32-bits large.
|
|
|
|
asm!("
|
|
|
|
push %ecx
|
2017-07-08 01:16:03 +08:00
|
|
|
mov %eax,%ecx
|
2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
2:
|
2017-07-08 01:16:03 +08:00
|
|
|
sub $$0x1000,%esp
|
|
|
|
test %esp,8(%esp)
|
2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
sub $$0x1000,%ecx
|
2017-07-08 01:16:03 +08:00
|
|
|
cmp $$0x1000,%ecx
|
2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
ja 2b
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-08 01:16:03 +08:00
|
|
|
sub %ecx,%esp
|
|
|
|
test %esp,8(%esp)
|
2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-08 01:16:03 +08:00
|
|
|
add %eax,%esp
|
2017-07-06 13:18:19 +08:00
|
|
|
pop %ecx
|
|
|
|
ret
|
|
|
|
");
|
|
|
|
::core::intrinsics::unreachable();
|
|
|
|
}
|