Explicit inputs instead of nested follows #5

New Issue

bradbqc · 2022-12-21T05:30:01+08:00

bradbqc commented

2022-12-21 05:30:01 +08:00

Since nix evaluates the follows directives relative to the root flake, DAX is now causing problems for users following the ARTIQ installation instructions. I think the most straightforward fix is to inclue DAX's follows as flake inputs here:

  inputs.nixpkgs.follows = "artiq/nixpkgs";
  inputs.sipyco.follows = "artiq/sipyco";
  inputs.daxpkgs = {
    url = git+https://gitlab.com/duke-artiq/dax.git;
    inputs = {
      artiqpkgs.follows = "artiq";
      nixpkgs.follows = "nixpkgs";
      sipyco.follows = "sipyco";
    };
  };
  
  outputs = { self, artiq, daxpkgs, nixpkgs, sipyco }:
    let
      pkgs = import nixpkgs { system = "x86_64-linux"; };

and then the corresponding nixpkgs and sipyco follows in the example flake in the ARTIQ docs, which conveniently avoids any explicit mention of DAX.

Since nix evaluates the `follows` directives relative to the root flake, DAX is now causing [problems](https://forum.m-labs.hk/d/537-trouble-setting-up-artiq-via-nix-flakes) for users following the ARTIQ installation instructions. I think the most straightforward fix is to inclue DAX's `follows` as flake inputs here: ```nix inputs.nixpkgs.follows = "artiq/nixpkgs"; inputs.sipyco.follows = "artiq/sipyco"; inputs.daxpkgs = { url = git+https://gitlab.com/duke-artiq/dax.git; inputs = { artiqpkgs.follows = "artiq"; nixpkgs.follows = "nixpkgs"; sipyco.follows = "sipyco"; }; }; outputs = { self, artiq, daxpkgs, nixpkgs, sipyco }: let pkgs = import nixpkgs { system = "x86_64-linux"; }; ``` and then the corresponding `nixpkgs` and `sipyco` follows in the example flake in the ARTIQ docs, which conveniently avoids any explicit mention of DAX.

sb10q commented

2022-12-21 09:28:22 +08:00

Since nix evaluates the follows directives relative to the root flake

Are you running recent Nix (2.8+)? They fixed a bunch of problems with flake follows in recent versions, which may or may not improve things here.

> Since nix evaluates the follows directives relative to the root flake Are you running recent Nix (2.8+)? They fixed a bunch of problems with flake follows in recent versions, which may or may not improve things here.

bradbqc commented

2022-12-21 22:39:09 +08:00

Poster

I'm on 2.11.0 - looks like we're stuck with this behavior

AFAICT it's intentional for whatever reason -- from the flake section of the nix manual:

The value of the follows attribute is a /-separated sequence of input names denoting the path of inputs to be followed from the root flake.

I'm on 2.11.0 - looks like we're stuck with this behavior AFAICT it's intentional for whatever reason -- from the flake section of the nix manual: > The value of the follows attribute is a /-separated sequence of input names denoting the path of inputs to be followed from the root flake.

bradbqc referenced this issue

2022-12-21 22:44:36 +08:00

move `follows` to top-level inputs #6

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Label

No Milestone

No project

No Assignees

2 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: M-Labs/artiq-extrapkg#5

Explicit inputs instead of nested follows #5

Explicit inputs instead of nested `follows` #5